Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced breast MRI versus X-ray mammography in women with different degrees of breast density

Author:

Barkhausen Jörg1,Bischof Arpad1,Haverstock Daniel2,Klemens Mark3,Brueggenwerth Guenther3,Weber Olaf45,Endrikat Jan46ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Luebeck, Germany

2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Whippany, NJ, USA

3. Bayer AG, General Clinical Imaging Services, 13353, Germany

4. Bayer AG, Radiology R&D, Berlin, Germany

5. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

6. University Medical School of Saarland, Dept of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Abstract

Background Detection of breast cancer in women with high breast densities is a clinical challenge. Purpose To study the influence of different degrees of breast density on the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (CE-BMRI) versus X-ray mammography (XRM). Material and Methods We performed an additional analysis of two large Phase III clinical trials (G1; G2) which included women with histologically proven breast cancers, called “index cancers.” Additional cancers were detected during image reading. We compared the sensitivity of CE-BMRI and XRM in women with different breast densities (ACR A→D; Version 5). For each study, six blinded readers evaluated the images. Results are given as the “Median Reader.” Results A total of 774 patients were included, 169 had additional cancers. While sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting all index cancers was independent of breast density (ACR A→D) (G1: 83%→83%; G2: 91%→91%) the sensitivity of XRM declined (ACR A→D) (G1: 79%→62%; G2: 82%→64%). Thus, the sensitivity difference between both imaging modalities in ACR A breasts of 3% (G1) and 9% (G2) increased to 21% (G1) and 26% (G2) in ACR D breasts. Sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting at least one additional cancer increased with increasing breast density (ACR A→D) (G1: 50%→73%, G2: 57%→81%). XRM’s sensitivity decreased (G1: 34%→20%) or remained stable (G2: 24%→25%). Conclusion CE-BMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity compared to XRM.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3