Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis

Author:

Stewart James1ORCID,Sahgal Arjun12,Chan Aimee K M3,Soliman Hany12,Tseng Chia-Lin12ORCID,Detsky Jay12,Myrehaug Sten12,Atenafu Eshetu G4,Helmi Ali3,Perry James5,Keith Julia6,Jane Lim-Fat Mary5,Munoz David G7,Zadeh Gelareh8,Shultz David B29,Das Sunit10,Coolens Catherine29,Alcaide-Leon Paula11,Maralani Pejman Jabehdar3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

11. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. Results: The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm3 vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm3, P = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm3 and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm3 smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups ( P = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) ( P= .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm3 vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm3, P = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. Conclusion: The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3