Comment: Academic Research in Management Organizations

Author:

Hitt Michael A.1

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University

Abstract

There has been significant criticism of academic research in management/organizations. Although some is valid, other criticism is unfair and sometimes inaccurate. Academic research in management is better than at any time in the past. Furthermore, teaching and research in management are not atomistic; rather, they can be highly complementary. Still, management research can be improved, perhaps, partially through research advisory boards (RABs) recommended by Ramon J. Aldag and Sally Riggs Fuller. However, RABs only provide part of the answer to the criticisms advanced. Current research in management/organizations has significant implications for practicing managers, but much of it is not easily accessible to them. Thus researchers must find ways to make their research more accessible to important constituencies. The author concludes that management research is alive, not dead. However, researchers must continue to improve it and respond to the criticisms from important constituencies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3