A Note on the Armstrongl Mitroff Debate-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Note on the Armstrongl Mitroff Debate

Published:1983-09 Issue:2 Volume:9 Page:203-211
ISSN:0149-2063
Container-title:Journal of Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Management

Author:

Boal Kimberly B.¹,Willis Raymond E.²

Affiliation:

1. Utah State University

2. University of Minnesota

Abstract

Recently, Armstrong and Mitroff have joined an important debate over the methods of science. We are afraid that because of the tongue-in-cheek fashion in which it was done that two important issues were intertwined and may not be fully appreciated. The issues involved the practice of science versus the methods and theory versus data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Strategy and Management,Finance

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014920638300900210

Reference18 articles.

1. Advocacy and Objectivity in Science

2. Advocacy as a Scientific Strategy: The Mitroff Myth

3. Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error.

4. Churchman, C.W. The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organ-ization. New York: Basic Books, 1971, 128-148.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. THREATS TO OBJECTIVITY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH;SPORTS, MEDIA AND BUSINESS;2023-12-02

2. A Paradigm Too Far? A Dynamic Stability Reconsideration of the Social Network Research Program;Academy of Management Review;2006-10

3. Editors’ Introduction;Journal of Management Inquiry;2002-06

4. Keeping the Tension: Pressures to Keep the Controversy in the Management Discipline;The Academy of Management Review;2000-04

5. Moving Sofas and Exhuming Woodchucks;Journal of Management Inquiry;1997-03