Affiliation:
1. City University of London, UK
Abstract
This paper analyses the working practices of several feminist creative and cultural enterprises in London (which I term ‘feminist CCIs’). In particular, it shows how pandemic precarity has driven feminist CCIs towards more entrepreneurial, self-promotional, and self-branding practices in order to sustain their work. Drawing on both digital ethnographic material and interviews with 12 workers in feminist CCIs conducted online between 2020 and 2022, the article provides insights into the landscape and contemporary realities of arts and cultural funding within these fields. It considers how decades of austerity measures and cuts have forced some feminist CCIs to operate independently outside of the UK public sector funding models. Survival tactics include adopting corporate funding models, subscription and membership schemes, platformisation and digitalisation. Focusing on funding, money and subjectivity, it unpacks the contradictions these imperatives bring to feminist politics: tensions about which some feminist CCI workers themselves are aware of and critical of. In the process, this paper considers how activism, feminism, entrepreneurialism, and precarity are fused together and negotiated in this form of ‘freelance feminism’.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education,Cultural Studies
Reference45 articles.
1. Empowered
2. Banks M, O’Connor J (2020) Culture after Covid. Available at: https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/11/culture-after-covid (Accessed 1 December 2020).
3. Autonomy and resilience in cultural work: looking beyond the ‘creative industries’
4. Brooks L, Moris S (2020) Millions of Britons clap for carers on coronavirus frontline. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/millions-of-britons-clap-for-carers-on-coronavirus-frontline (Accessed 15 December 2020).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献