Affiliation:
1. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
2. Polytechnic Institute of Milan, Italy
Abstract
This article proposes a critique of “data colonialism” as elaborated by Nick Couldry and Ulises Mejias. The main limitation of this theory is the essentialist conception of “colonialism,” “quantifier sector” and “self,” which overlooks historical-materialist roots and hinders a comprehensive understanding of datafication as a socio-cultural process. By recontextualizing some of the authors’ major claims, especially with regard to China, it is advanced the need to think about datafication as emerging out of a complex networked ecology whose founding logic is one of abstracted digital rationality. Some propositions—in the forms of ethnographic research and teachings along the line of data activism—are also elaborated.
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Cultural Studies
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献