Comparison of Radiographic Talar Loosening Rates Between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II

Abstract

Background: Despite substantial increase in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) nationwide, there are few studies comparing flat-cut vs chamfer-cut talar systems in TAA with regard to radiographic aseptic loosening rates of the implant. Methods: This retrospective study included 189 Salto-Talaris TAA and 132 INBONE II primary TAA with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patient characteristics were obtained including gender, age at surgery, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, primary diagnosis, surgical time, and the presence of diabetes. Radiographic evidence for aseptic loosening was assessed. Statistical analysis was performed for comparison in outcomes between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II. Results: The mean age of the study population was 63.5 ± 9.8 years at surgery. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 3.0 years. Radiographic aseptic loosening of the tibial implant showed no significant difference between the 2 groups: Salto-Talaris, 18%, and INBONE II, 18.9% ( P = .829). Aseptic loosening of the talar implant also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups: Salto-Talaris, 1.6%, and INBONE II, 1.5% ( P = .959). No variables, including the implant type, were found to contribute to the aseptic loosening rate of either the tibia or talus. Conclusion: In our cohort, we observed no difference in radiographic implant aseptic loosening between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II systems. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series study.