Variable Volumes of Resected Bone Resulting From Different Total Ankle Arthroplasty Systems

Author:

Goetz Jessica E.1,Rungprai Chamnanni2,Tennant Joshua N.3,Huber Emmalei4,Uribe Bastian5,Femino John1,Phisitkul Phinit1,Amendola Annunziato6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

3. Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Department of Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

Background: The increased popularity and success of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has resulted in the development of varying TAA hardware designs, many of which include specific bone-sparing or bone-sacrificing features. The goal of this work was to determine differences in the volume of bone removed for implantation of different total ankle arthroplasty hardware systems. Methods: Sixteen cadaveric specimens were computed tomography–scanned preoperatively and after total ankle arthroplasty using either an INBONE II, Salto Talaris, STAR, or Zimmer TMTA implant. Geometries of the talus and the distal tibia were manually segmented and converted to 3D bony surface models. The volume of bone removed for each implant was calculated as the difference in volume between the preoperative and postoperative bone models. To account for differences in specimen size, volume was expressed as a percentage of the intact bone. Results: There was a significant difference ( P = .049) in the average percent of talar bone removed, with the STAR and INBONE II systems requiring removal of greater volumes of bone. The INBONE II system required significantly ( P < .004) more tibial bone resection than the other 3 implants when evaluating a long span of the distal tibia. However, most of this increased bone resection was medullary bone. Close to the articular surface, bone volumes removed for the various tibial components were not significantly different ( P = .056). Conclusion: Volume and location of bone removed for different implant systems varied with implant design. Clinical Relevance: Primary bone resection associated with different implant hardware systems varied more on the talar side of the articulation, and the stemmed prosthesis did not result in dramatic increases in periarticular bone resection. Clinicians should weigh the effects of greater or lesser bone resection associated with various implant designs against other factors used for hardware selection.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3