Affiliation:
1. University of Cambridge, UK
Abstract
In responding to Jan Smedslund's (1998) paper, this commentary first of all considers the value of vagueness for research in social psychology. Second, I argue that Smedslund's consideration of social representations underestimates both the representational and social aspects of the theory. This discussion leads to some broader characterizations of social representations, and particularly to the relation between social representations and cultural psychology. Finally, these comments conclude with a discussion of the role of language in social psychological research, and suggests that while both psychologic and social representations are concerned with the analysis of common sense, they approach this analysis from different theoretical positions.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Original sin or natural order: Dialogical construction of social knowledge of animal production;European Journal of Social Psychology;2024-01-25
2. Cultural Psychology;International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching;2022-12-17
3. Natural, enjoyable, and Finnish: Social representations of eating meat in Finnish meat product advertisements;Journal of Social and Political Psychology;2022-07-18
4. Cultural Psychology;International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching;2022
5. Cultural Psychology;International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching;2021-12-25