Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
Reference47 articles.
1. Kutz G. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: misleading test results are further complicated by deceptive marketing and other questionable practices: congressional testimony. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office; 2010.
2. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). At-Home Genetic Tests: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism May Be the Best Prescription. Washington, DC: FTC; 2006. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/health/hea02.shtm. Accessed July 25, 2017.
3. Shuren J. Direct to consumer genetic testing and the consequences to the public. Food and Drug Administration; 2010. https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm219925.htm. Accessed July 25, 2017.
4. Roberts MC, Dusetzina SB. The effect of a celebrity health disclosure on demand for health care: trends in BRCA testing and subsequent health services use. J Commun Genet. 2017;8:141–146.
5. Desai S, Jena AB. Christmas 2016: Famous Figures: Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie’s New York Times editorial. BMJ. 2016;355.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献