Are Leadership Preferences Gendered? A Conjoint Analysis of Employee Preferences for Manager Characteristics in Male- and Female-Dominated Public Sub-Sectors in the Netherlands

Author:

Offringa Sophie1ORCID,Groeneveld Sandra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University & Rebel Group

2. Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University

Abstract

This article examines the consequences of stereotypical beliefs regarding gender, traits, and leadership styles for manager preferences in public organizational contexts that differ as to the gender composition of their workforce. It is hypothesized that employee preferences for male, agentic, and/or transactional managers relative to female, communal, and/or transformational managers are stronger in male-dominated contexts than in female-dominated contexts. Hypotheses are tested through a conjoint survey experiment among 2,757 Dutch public sector employees in education, police, and defense. Findings show that there is a stronger preference for communal managers over agentic managers in both contexts, independent of the manager’s gender. In contrast, employee preferences for transactional leadership relative to transformational leadership are stronger in male-dominated contexts than in female-dominated contexts and vice versa, also independent of the gender of the manager. The article discusses the implications of the study’s findings for the study of gender and leadership preferences.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Public Administration

Reference68 articles.

1. Gender and the Effectiveness of Leadership Training: Results From a Field Experiment

2. Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

3. Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model

4. Barari S., Berwick E., Hainmueller J., Hopkins D., Liu S., Strezhnev A., Yamamoto T. (2018). AMCE estimator for conjoint experiments. R package version 2.1.0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cjoint/cjoint.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3