Affiliation:
1. Old Dominion University
2. California State University
Abstract
The 1990s witnessed the criminalization of elder abuse. This criminalization included the creation of mandatory-reporting legislation, increased penalties for elder abusers, and modifications in criminal procedures for older victims. Little attention has been given to those officials actually involved in deciding how elder abuse cases should be handled. This research considers the sanctions recommended by police chiefs and ombudsmen for six different types of offenses against seniors. Attention is also directed toward potential differences between the groups' attitudes about elder abuse. Results indicate that ombudsmen see nursing home offenses as more severe than street offenses or white-collar offenses. Police chiefs see street offenses as the most severe offense type. Implications are provided.
Subject
Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Baker, A. A. (1975). Granny battering. Modern Geriatrics, 8, 20-24.
2. Blake, K. (1996). Phone scam update: Seniors beware. Consumer's Research Magazine, 79(2), 23-27.
3. The Relative Contributions of Occupation Groups in the Discovery and Treatment of Elder Abuse and Neglect
4. Blakely, B. E. & Dolon, R. (1998). A test of public reactions to alleged elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 9, 43-65.
5. Blakely, B. E. & Dolon, R. (2000). Perceptions of adult protective service workers of the support provided by criminal justice professionals in a case of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 12, 71-94.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献