Building the capacity – examining the impact of evidence-based public health trainings in Europe: a mixed methods approach

Author:

Serrano Natalicio1ORCID,Diem Gunter2,Grabauskas Vilius3,Shatchkute Aushra4,Stachenko Sylvie5,Deshpande Anjali6,Gillespie Kathleen N.7,Baker Elizabeth A.7,Vartinaien Erkki8,Brownson Ross C.18

Affiliation:

1. Prevention Research Center in St Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

2. Vorarlberg Public Health Society, Vorarlberg, Austria

3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Lithuanian Health Sciences University, Kaunas, Lithuania

4. Former Regional Adviser, Chronic Diseases, CINDI Coordinator, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

6. University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA

7. College for Public Health & Social Justice, St Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA

8. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Objective: Since 2002, a course entitled ‘Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH): A Course in Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) Prevention’ has been taught annually in Europe as a collaboration between the Prevention Research Center in St Louis and other international organizations. The core purpose of this training is to strengthen the capacity of public health professionals, in order to apply and adapt evidence-based programmes in NCD prevention. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of this EBPH course, in order to inform and improve future EBPH trainings. Methods: A total of 208 individuals participated in the European EBPH course between 2007 and 2016. Of these, 86 (41%) completed an online survey. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of EBPH skills/materials/resources, benefits of using EBPH and barriers to using EBPH. Analysis was performed to see if time since taking the course affected EBPH effectiveness. Participants were then stratified by frequency of EBPH use (low v. high) and asked to participate in in-depth telephone interviews to further examine the long-term impact of the course ( n = 11 (6 low use, 5 high use)). Findings: The most commonly reported benefits among participants included: acquiring knowledge about a new subject (95%), seeing applications for this knowledge in their own work (84%), and becoming a better leader to promote evidence-based decision-making (82%). Additionally, not having enough funding for continued training in EBPH (44%), co-workers not having EBPH training (33%) and not having enough time to implement EBPH approaches (30%) were the most commonly reported barriers to using EBPH. Interviews indicated that work-place and leadership support were important in facilitating the use of EBPH. Conclusion: Although the EBPH course effectively benefits participants, barriers remain towards widely implementing evidence-based approaches. Reaching and communicating with those in leadership roles may facilitate the growth of EBPH across countries.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference12 articles.

1. Evidence-based public health

2. Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice

3. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.

4. Educational Attainment of the Public Health Workforce and Its Implications for Workforce Development

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3