Desire to Die Statements in the Era of Voluntary Assisted Dying: An Audit of Patients Known to a Victorian Consultation-Liaison Palliative Care Service

Author:

Adams Vassilika1,Katz Naomi T.2ORCID,Philip Jennifer A. M.3,Gold Michelle4

Affiliation:

1. Alfred Health Palliative Care Service, Alfred Health, Prahran, VIC, Australia

2. Alfred Health Palliative Care Service, Alfred Health, Prahran; Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, Royal Children’s Hospital; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3. Palliative Care Service, St Vincent’s Hospital, Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. Alfred Health Palliative Care Service, Alfred Health, Prahran; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Objectives: In the new era of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) legislation in Australia, this study aimed to explore (1) underlying reasons for desire to die statements (DTDSs), (2) clinician responses to DTDSs and (3) whether DTDSs were a true request for VAD. Methods: Clinical audit using an existing prospectively collected quality assurance database, supplemented by electronic medical records. Patients known to a consultation-liaison palliative care service who expressed a DTDS between October 2019 and September 2020 were included. Results: Forty-one patients were included; 29 (71%) were male, 29 (71%) had a malignancy and 31 (76%) expressed a DTDS more than once. Uncontrolled psychological symptoms were present more often than physical (n = 30 vs 19 [73% vs 46%]), yet physical symptoms were addressed more frequently than psychological (80% vs 63% of the time). Based on available data, the VAD assessment process was commenced by 7 patients, and death by VAD occurred for 2 patients. Conclusions: In our study, DTDSs were complex, multi-layered requests that more commonly reflected psychological rather than physical suffering. Though VAD is now legally possible, a DTDS was not always synonymous with a request for VAD. Key to responding to these requests are high levels of clinician confidence and communication skills. Training in this area remains critical for the experience of both patients and clinicians.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3