Running in circles or moving along lines: Conceptualization of musical elements in sighted and blind children

Author:

Antović Mihailo1,Bennett Austin2,Turner Mark2

Affiliation:

1. University of Niš, Serbia

2. Case Western Reserve University, USA

Abstract

In the present study, we address the perceptual basis for developing abstract concepts by investigating if there are any differences in the way sighted and blind 10-year-olds conceptualize some basic musical relations. Thirty-four sighted and nine blind US elementary school students (seven congenitally blind) were exposed to 10 diametrically-opposed musical stimuli (a high and low tone, a quick and slow succession of pitches, a major and minor chord, and so on) and asked to verbally describe what the first and what the second part of the sequence sounded like. Upon transcription, their verbalizations were classified into higher-order conceptual categories. Distributions of responses so grouped were then compared. Results support the theoretical position that metaphorization is the principal mechanism in conceptualizing musical elements, and suggest a preference for visuo-spatial descriptions of the sequences. While sighted children’s verbalizations seemed more referential and took less time to produce overall, the conceptual categories in the two groups reveal no differences. We suggest three possible explanations for this result: (1) the studied concepts might be more abstractly spatial, rather than visually-grounded, for both populations; (2) the concepts might derive from visuo-spatial stimulation for the sighted, and more generally embodied experience in the blind, which however produces the same linguistic output; (3) the concepts might be visuo-spatial in the sighted, and the blind could have adopted the terminology upon hearing it from the sighted, irrespective of their own sensory experience.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Music,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3