“One Degree of Separation”: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Canadian Mental Health Care User and Provider Experiences With Remote Care During COVID-19

Author:

Ceniti Amanda K.123ORCID,Abdelmoemin Wegdan R.2,Ho Keith24,Kang Yudi4,Placenza Franca4,Laframboise Rachel4,Bhat Venkat12345ORCID,Foster Jane A.46,Frey Benicio N.67,Lam Raymond W.8ORCID,Milev Roumen910,Rotzinger Susan1245,Soares Claudio N.910,Uher Rudolf11ORCID,Kennedy Sidney H.12345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Arthur Sommer Rotenberg Suicide & Depression Studies Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada

2. Centre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada

3. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

4. Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

7. Mood Disorders Program and Women’s Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada

8. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

9. Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

10. Providence Care, Kingston, ON, Canada

11. Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

Abstract

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a shift from in-person to remote mental health care. While remote care methods have long existed, their widespread use is unprecedented. There is little research about mental health care user and provider experiences with this transition, and no published studies to date have compared satisfaction between these groups. Methods Canadian mental health care users ( n = 332) and providers ( n = 107) completed an online self-report survey from October 2020 to February 2021 hosted by the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression. Using a mixed-methods approach, participants were asked about their use of remote care, including satisfaction, barriers to use, helpful and unhelpful factors, and suggestions for improvement. Results Overall, 59% to 63% of health care users and 59% of health care providers were satisfied with remote care. Users reported the greatest satisfaction with the convenience of remote care, while providers were most satisfied with the speed of provision of care; all groups were least satisfied with therapeutic rapport. Health care providers were less satisfied with the user-friendliness of remote care ( P < 0.001) than users, while health care users were less satisfied than providers with continuity of care ( P < 0.001). The use of a video-based platform was associated with remote care satisfaction among health care users ( P < 0.02), and qualitative responses support the importance of visual cues in maintaining therapeutic rapport remotely. The majority of users (55%) and providers (87%) reported a likelihood of using remote care after the pandemic. Conclusions Remote mental health care is generally accepted by both users and providers, and the majority would consider using remote care following the pandemic. Suggestions for improvement include greater use of video, increased attention to body language and eye contact, consistency with in-person care, as well as increased provider training and administrative support.

Funder

Ontario Brain Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3