Virtual Care: Perspectives From Family Physicians

Author:

Ritchie Olivia1,Koptyra Emily1,Marquis Liz B.2,Kadri Reema1,Laurie Anna R.3,Vydiswaran V.G. Vinod24,Li Jiazhao2,Brown Lindsay K.2,Veinot Tiffany C.245,Buis Lorraine R.16,Guetterman Timothy C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

2. School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

3. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

4. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

5. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

6. School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care expanded rapidly at Michigan Medicine and other health systems. From family physicians’ perspectives, this shift to virtual care has the potential to affect workflow, job satisfaction, and patient communication. As clinics reopened and care delivery models shifted to a combination of in-person and virtual care, the need to understand physician experiences with virtual care arose in order to improve both patient and provider experiences. This study investigated Michigan Medicine family medicine physicians’ perceptions of virtual care through qualitative interviews to better understand how to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care for both patients and physicians. Methods: We employed a qualitative descriptive design to examine physician perspectives through semistructured interviews. We coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA (VERBI) software. Results: The results of the analysis identified four major themes: (a) chief concerns that are appropriate for virtual evaluation, (b) physician perceptions of patient benefits, (c) focused but contextually enriched patient-physician communication, and (d) structural support needed for high-quality virtual care. Conclusions: These findings can help further direct the discussion of how to make use of resources to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care.

Publisher

Society of Teachers of Family Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3