Knowledge of Galactagogue Use During Breastfeeding in Australia: A Cross Sectional Online Survey

Author:

McBride Grace McKenzie12ORCID,Stevenson Robyn1,Zizzo Gabriella1,Rumbold Alice R123,Amir Lisa H45ORCID,Keir Amy K123,Grzeskowiak Luke Edward12367

Affiliation:

1. Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

2. Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

3. SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

4. Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia

5. Breastfeeding Service, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

6. SA Pharmacy, SA Health, Adelaide, Australia

7. Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Abstract

Background: Galactagogues have been used for centuries to induce, maintain, or increase a mother’s milk supply. Recently, there has been an apparent increase in utilization and promotion of galactagogues, largely in the absence of data regarding their efficacy and safety. However, there is limited contemporary evidence about knowledge of these substances in the community or how and where individuals seek information. Research Aim: To evaluate knowledge about galactagogue use during breastfeeding among birth parents, including recognition of specific substances, perceptions of safety, and common information sources. Method: An online, prospective, cross-sectional survey of Australian birthing parents ( N = 2055) who were currently breastfeeding or had previously breastfed their infants was conducted from September to December 2019. The survey included questions about recognition of galactagogues, perceptions of safety, and information-seeking behaviors. Results: Among participants, 47% ( n = 882) were primiparous and 65% ( n = 1,219) were currently breastfeeding. The most recognized galactagogues included lactation cookies (89%; n = 1,828), brewer's yeast (79%; n = 1,629), fenugreek (74%; n = 1,519), and domperidone (69%; n = 1,420). Respondents cited the internet (52%; n = 1,066), lactation support providers (46%; n = 951), midwives (42%; n = 873), general practitioners (39%; n = 802), and social media (35%; n = 714) as common information sources. Lactation support providers and breastfeeding helplines were commonly rated as helpful; whereas, general practitioners and community pharmacists were often rated as unhelpful. While most participants perceived galactagogues to be safe, herbal or dietary galactagogues were perceived to be safer than pharmaceutical galactagogues. Conclusions: Our Australian community survey of individuals with current or previous breastfeeding experience identified widespread recognition of galactagogue use, with participants reporting a broad range of information-seeking behaviors and generally perceiving galactagogues as being safe to use.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship

Robinson Research Institute

Channel 7 Children’s Research Foundation Fellowship

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

The Hospital Research Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference34 articles.

1. The Limitations of Online Surveys

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Breastfeeding. Retrieved December 9, 2021 from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/breastfeeding/2017-18

3. Australian Government. (2020). Trends in online behaviour and technology usage: ACMA consumer survey 2020. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/Trends-in-online-behaviour-and-technology-usage_ACMA-consumer-survey-2020.pdf

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2021, September). Australia's mothers and babies 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies

5. Baby Friendly Health Initiative Australia. (2020). About BFHI. https://bfhi.org.au/about/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3