Criteria inadequacy of the vehicles used for the calculation of safety parameters in the EN1317-TB11 test

Author:

Özcanan Sedat1ORCID,Özcan Özgür1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Sirnak University, Sirnak, Turkey

Abstract

Road restraint systems-RRS are passive safety designs installed on roadsides to ensure the safety of errant vehicle passengers as well as pedestrians. The adequacy of these systems is assessed through full-scale vehicle crash testing for which evaluation criteria are determined by standards such as EN1317. Recently the same RRS is crash tested two times with two different 900 kg passenger cars and test results varied significantly. After a failed crash test instead of modifying the barrier test vehicle was replaced and the same test was repeated. It was surprising to see that the failed RRS this time satisfied the EN1317 evaluation criteria. Despite the use of the same mass vehicle in the crash tests, the different results obtained were a source of motivation for investigating the inadequacy of EN1317. In this study, the adequacy of the 900 kg vehicle criteria used in the determination of the safety parameters in the EN1317-TB11 test was investigated by creating validated finite element-FE models. After the FE analysis it was concluded that test vehicle properties, such as vehicle mass and velocity provided in EN1317 are deemed to be insufficient and more explicit vehicle selection parameters, given in the study, are needed to provide safer and more uniform crash testing results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Aerospace Engineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. IMPACT OF ELECTRIC CARS ON THE CRASH PERFORMANCE OF LONGITUDINAL BARRIERS;Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi;2024-06-03

2. Crashworthiness of the bollard system by experimentally validated virtual test;Engineering Failure Analysis;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3