Author:
Biggers Daniel R.,Hanmer Michael J.
Abstract
AbstractRecent elections have witnessed substantial debate regarding the degree to which state governments facilitate access to the polls. Despite this newfound interest, however, many of the major reforms aimed at increasing voting convenience (i.e., early voting and no-excuse absentee voting) were implemented over the past four decades. Although numerous studies examine their consequences (on turnout, the composition of the electorate, and/or electoral outcomes), we know significantly less about the factors leading to the initial adoption of these policies. We attempt to provide insights into such motivations using event history analysis to identify the impact of political and demographic considerations, as well as diffusion mechanisms, on which states opted for easier ballot access. We find that adoption responded to some factors signaling the necessity of greater voting convenience in the state, and that partisanship influenced the enactment of early voting but not no-excuse absentee voting procedures.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference65 articles.
1. Cemenska, Nathan , Leighley, Jan E. , Nagler, Jonathan , and Tokaji, Daniel P. . 2009. Report on the 1972-2008 Early and Absentee Voting Dataset. Pew Charitable Trusts. 14 December. (accessed January 27, 2015).
2. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data
3. What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献