Legislative Civility, Gridlock, Polarization, and Productivity
-
Published:2023-11-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-22
-
ISSN:1532-4400
-
Container-title:State Politics & Policy Quarterly
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:State Politics Policy Q.
Author:
Schreckhise William D.ORCID,
Pierce John C.,
Benjamin Francis A.,
Lovrich Nicholas P.,
Button EricORCID
Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between legislative civility and legislative productivity in US state legislatures. The research employs data from the National Survey of State Legislative Lobbyists and from the State Policy Innovation and Diffusion (SPID) database. The former dataset is used to generate an overall civility index for each state as developed by Kettler et al. The SPID database allows one to measure the legislative productivity of a state legislature. Employing these data, negative binomial and Poisson regression models reveal that state legislatures rated as more civil by their own lobbyists produced significantly more pieces of noteworthy legislation than those legislative bodies rated as less civil. These results suggest that the quality of internal legislative dynamics matters for legislative productivity.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference77 articles.
1. Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock
2. Warshaw, Christopher and Caughey, Devin . 2015, “Replication Data for: The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936–2014.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZXZMJB, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:iT+06z1StLiNW/PM9TQpCA==[fileUNF].
3. Is It Us? Is It Them? Or Is It This Place? Predicting Civility in State Legislatures
4. Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献