Author:
Vining Richard L.,Wilhelm Teena,Collens Jack D.
Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we present and test a market-based model of news content about state courts of last resort. We test our theory by examining newspaper coverage of decisions in death penalty cases. Our empirical results indicate that news elements of drama, novelty, and sensationalism influence coverage of state high courts' death penalty cases rather than traditional indicators of legal salience. News content either anywhere in a newspaper or on its front page is influenced by similar factors, but front-page coverage is more sensitive to dramatic conviction reversals and the rarity of executions in a given state. Our results suggest that traditional explanations of the relationship between crime and newsworthiness have limited impact on media attention given to state supreme courts. Media coverage of state high courts is instead associated primarily with the behavior of the court and its justices.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference59 articles.
1. Full-Court Press: An Examination of Media Coverage of State Supreme Courts;Yanus;Justice System Journal,2009
2. Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts
3. Death Penalty for Female Offenders;Streib;Cincinnati Law Review,1989
4. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献