Affiliation:
1. Graduate Schools of Education and Business, Putnam House, Harvard University
Abstract
The rhetoric of personal growth programs represents, as Shepard suggests (J.A.B.S. 6 (3), 259-266), an alternative culture. However, when one attempts to study the actual behavior of participants in a laboratory, preliminary research suggests that it may bb closer to the established culture than to a "clearer vision of a better life." A theoretical framework is here proposed in an attempt to explain the apparent discrepancy between the actual behavior of participants and what they say they experienced and learned in personal growth programs.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. JABS at 50;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science;2014-10-10
2. Designing for Quality;The Journal of Higher Education;1985-11
3. Reflecting on Laboratory Education from a Theory of Action Perspective;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science;1979-07
4. Focus and Flexibility in a Model of Conflict Resolution;Journal of Conflict Resolution;1977-09
5. Book Review Section;Personnel Psychology;1977-06