Clinical and vascular responses to propranolol and candesartan in migraine patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Author:

Barzenje Aros Dlawer1,Gjesdal Knut23,Winsvold Bendik Slagsvold4,Småstuen Milada Cvancarova5,Stovner Lars Jacob67,Gravdahl Gøril Bruvik7,Nilsen Kristian Bernhard468

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

3. Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway

4. Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan Uniersity, Oslo, Norway

6. Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

7. National Advisory Unit on Headaches, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

8. Section for Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Division of Cinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Norway

Abstract

Background: Both propranolol and candesartan are prophylactic drugs for migraine, but with unknown mechanisms of action. The objectives of the present study were to investigate these drugs’ effects on arterial wall dynamics and the potential relation between their vascular and clinical effect. Methods: The study was based on data from a previously published randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded, double crossover clinical trial comparing the prophylactic effects of candesartan and propranolol in 72 patients. Finapres noninvasive blood pressure curves were analyzed. On the descending limb of the pulse curve, a notch is produced by pulse wave reflection, and its relative height compared to the top of the curve (the notch ratio) was used as a marker of arterial wall stiffness. Results: Candesartan decreased the notch ratio from baseline ( p = 0.005), reflecting more compliant arteries and vasodilation, whereas propranolol increased the notch ratio ( p = 0.005), reflecting less compliant arteries and vasoconstriction. There was no difference in baseline notch ratio between clinical responders and nonresponders. Conclusion: The drugs are both efficient prophylactic medications, yet they have opposite effects on arterial wall dynamics. This suggests that drug effects other than those on arterial compliance must be responsible for their prophylactic effect in migraine.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3