The influence of tactical formation on physical and technical match performance in male soccer: A systematic review

Author:

Forcher Leon12ORCID,Forcher Leander1ORCID,Wäsche Hagen1,Jekauc Darko1,Woll Alexander1,Altmann Stefan13

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

2. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim, Zuzenhausen, Germany

3. TSG ResearchLab gGmbH, Zuzenhausen, Germany

Abstract

The number of investigations that specifically address the influence of formation on soccer performance has increased in recent years. Since there is no overview that summarizes these effects, this systematic review aims to synthesize the available literature on the effects of tactical formation on physical and technical match performance. According to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was performed (Databases: PubMed and Web of Science). Studies were included, if they reported any physical (e.g., sprinting distance) or technical (e.g., number of passes) match performance parameters and compared at least two different formations. The study outcomes were synthesized descriptively. The effect of formation on physical performance was investigated in ten studies while three studies investigated the effect on technical performance (11 studies included). The studies revealed that formation has an effect on the physical and technical match performance of soccer players both in a team and at a positional level. On a team level, smaller differences were observed for formations that are similar in the number of players in each playing position (i.e., 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1). Furthermore, physical match performance was higher in formations with three defenders (e.g., 3-5-2) in comparison to formations with four defenders (e.g., 4-4-2). On a positional level, all positions were affected in a similar way by formation. Therefore, formation affects the physical and technical match performance of soccer players and if the playing position is also considered, the results become even more meaningful. The studies were very heterogeneous regarding their methodology (i.e., parameters, sample size). The findings can help coaches to design their training programs and to prepare the players for a specific positional role depending on the tactical formation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3