Randomised controlled trial of the Healthy Living Triple P–Positive Parenting Program for families of children with type 1 diabetes

Author:

Mitchell Amy E123ORCID,Morawska Alina3ORCID,Lohan Aditi4,Filus Ania5,Batch Jennifer67

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

5. DaVita Clinical Research, San Antonio, TX, USA

6. School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

7. Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

This randomised controlled trial examined the efficacy of a brief, group-based parenting program in improving child and family outcomes for families of children with type 1 diabetes. Families ( N = 50) of children (2–10 years) with type 1 diabetes were randomly allocated to intervention ( n = 22) or care-as-usual ( n = 28). Assessments (pre-intervention, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up) evaluated parent- and child-reported parenting behaviour, child behaviour/adjustment and child quality of life (primary outcomes); and metabolic control (routinely-collected blood glucose data), parents’ self-efficacy with diabetes management, diabetes-specific child behaviour difficulties, family quality of life, parents’ diabetes-related and general parenting stress and observed parent and child behaviour (secondary outcomes). Intent-to-treat analyses indicated greater rate of improvement over time for families allocated to intervention compared to care-as-usual for use of corporal punishment (primary caregivers only), and confidence with managing children’s emotions/behaviours, parent-rated child quality of life and adjustment to the child’s illness (secondary caregivers only). There were no other intervention effects. Although families found the intervention useful, low levels of psychosocial problems at baseline limited the scope for group-level improvement and there was limited evidence for intervention efficacy. Individually-tailored measures of goal-specific behaviour change may be considered in future research.

Funder

Children’s Hospital Foundation

Australian Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3