Abstract
Since the 1990s, most Latin American countries have significantly expanded noncontributory pension programs. In explaining this wave of expansion, research has focused on the protagonism of left parties and social movements and on electoral competition, generally disregarding the roles of organized business and conservative policy experts. This article demonstrates, through a detailed analysis of Chile’s 2008 noncontributory pension reform, that conservative economists played active roles in formulating a noncontributory pension policy characterized by moderate, targeted, and “incentive-compatible” benefits and financed by the general budget. The conservative design of the program facilitated broad support from employers and private pension funds, critical for the eventual passage of the reform. The analysis illustrates the need to incorporate business interests into explanations of welfare state reforms in Latin America and the broader Global South, in particular by distinguishing the interests of employers and private providers and by focusing on their interaction with conservative policy experts.
Funder
studienstiftung des deutschen volkes
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pension Reform Policy in Latin America: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis;Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice;2024-06-04
2. Challenging the policy space: The legitimation of alternatives in Chilean pension policy (1980–2019);Latin American Policy;2024-05-20
3. Conclusion;Global Dynamics of Social Policy;2024
4. Incorporation;Global Dynamics of Social Policy;2024
5. Institutions;Global Dynamics of Social Policy;2024