Abstract
AbstractThis Conclusion brings together the main strands of the argumentation in the book. It revisits its main findings and discusses their contribution to advancing a general theory of welfare institutions. It concludes by speculating on the implications of the analysis in the book for policy.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference53 articles.
1. Abramo, L., Cecchini, S., & Morales, B. (2019). Programas sociales, superación de la pobreza e inclusión laboral. CEPAL.
2. Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., & Sen, M. (2016). Explaining causal findings without bias: Detecting and assessing direct effects. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000216
3. Arenas de Mesa, A. (2019). Los sistemas de pensiones en la encrucijada. Desafíos para la sostenibilidad en América Latina (159; Libros de La CEPAL). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.
4. Arenas de Mesa, A. (2020). Los sistemas de pensiones en América Latina. Institucionalidad, gasto público y sostenibilidad financiera en tiempos de COVID-19 (Documento 212; Macroeconomía Del Desarrollo). Economic Commission for Latin America.
5. Arza, C., Castiglioni, R., Martínez Franzoni, J., Niedzwiecki, S., Pribble, J., & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2022). The political economy of segmented expansion. Latin American Social Policy in the 2000s. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009344135