Barriers and facilitators of health professionals in adopting digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness: A systematic review

Author:

Rodrigues Daniela A.123ORCID,Roque Maria4,Mateos-Campos Ramona5,Figueiras Adolfo678,Herdeiro Maria Teresa9,Roque Fátima12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Laboratory on Epidemiology and Population Health, Polytechnic of Guarda (IPG), Guarda, Portugal

2. Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), Covilhã, Portugal

3. University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

4. Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

5. Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

6. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

7. Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain

8. Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health-CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain

9. Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

Abstract

Objective Digital health is described as the use and development of all types of digital technologies to improve health outcomes. It could be used to prevent medication errors, a priority for health systems worldwide. However, the adoption of such tools remains slow. This study aims to identify factors (attitudes, knowledge and beliefs) acting as barriers and/or facilitators reported by healthcare professionals (HCPs) for the adoption of digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the literature in the MEDLINE PubMed, and EMBASE scientific databases for original articles regarding qualitative and quantitative data. Results Fifteen articles were included and a total of 125 barriers and 108 facilitators were identified, consolidated and categorized into technical (n = 48), organizational (n = 12), economical (n = 4), user-related (n = 34), and patient-related (n = 8) components. The most often reported barriers and facilitators were technical component-related ones concerning the need for additional training (n = 6), the time consumed (n = 6), and the easy way of using or learning how to use the tools (n = 9), respectively. Regarding setting analysis, agreement with clinical decision recommendations and impact on the doctor–patient relationship were more valued in primary care, while the user interface and system design were in the hospital. Conclusions The barriers and facilitators identified in this study provide relevant information to developers and it can be used as a starting point for the designing of successful digital health-related tools, specifically related to medication appropriateness. Future research includes economic evaluation-focused studies and in-depth case studies of specific barriers and facilitators.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Health Policy

Reference91 articles.

1. Fahy N, Williams GA. Use of digital health tools in Europe: before, during and after COVID-19. Policy brief 42.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3