Pan‐European survey on medication adherence management by healthcare professionals

Author:

Kamusheva Maria1ORCID,Aarnio Emma2ORCID,Qvarnström Miriam3,Hafez Gaye4,Mucherino Sara5,Potočnjak Ines67ORCID,Trečiokiene Indre89,Mihajlović Jovan1011,Ekenberg Marie3,van Boven Job F. M.12,Leiva‐Fernandez Francisca13,

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy Medical University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria

2. School of Pharmacy University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

3. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

4. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy Altinbas University Istanbul Türkiye

5. CIRFF, Department of Pharmacy University of Naples Federico II Naples NA Italy

6. Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center Zagreb Croatia

7. School of Medicine Catholic University of Croatia Zagreb Croatia

8. Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania

9. University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands

10. Mihajlović Health Analytics Novi Sad Serbia

11. Medical Faculty University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia

12. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands

13. Andalusian Health Service‐IBIMA‐University of Malaga Malaga Spain

Abstract

AbstractAimsWhile medication adherence (MA) is a key prerequisite for achieving optimal clinical and economic outcomes, nonadherence is highly prevalent. Assessing how healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Europe manage MA, focusing on measurement, reporting and interventions, is the subject of this study.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted among 40 European countries and quantitative analysis was conducted via an online survey. The multi‐language online survey was created using Webropol 3.0 survey and reporting tool. Descriptive statistics and chi‐squared tests were applied.ResultsIn total, 2875 HCPs (pharmacists: 39.9%; physicians: 36.7%; nurses: 16.4%) from 37 European countries participated. The most used methods for MA assessment were direct communication with patients (86.4%) and referring to personal patient records (56.7%) (P < 0.0001). Physicians (74.9%) and nurses (58.8%) were more aware of problems related to MA in contrast to pharmacists (48.6%) (P < 0.001). Almost all HCPs (92.6%) indicated that MA‐enhancing interventions involved mainly direct communication with nonadherent patients (93.3%) and their caregivers (55.7%). Medication review and related optimization of therapy were mainly performed in Western European countries (46.8%). Technological solutions were ranked as one of the less applied approaches (10–15%) (P < 0.001).ConclusionsHCPs in all European regions recognize MA management as an integral element of overall patient‐centred care. More efforts are needed to ensure timely, adequate and relevant MA assessment, reporting and improvement and involvement of all HCPs, especially among pharmacists who were generally less aware of MA issues. Promotion and use of digital technological solutions should be the focus of current and future clinical practice to optimize MA management processes.

Funder

European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3