The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and decision-making about daily treatment regimens: a mixed methods exploratory study

Author:

Basile Melissa1ORCID,Polo Jennifer2,Henthorne Katherine3,DeCelie-Germana Joan4,Galvin Susan5,Wang Janice6

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 600 Community Drive, Suite 403, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA

2. Prevention Program, Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Great Neck, NY, USA

3. Adult Pulmonary Medicine and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA

4. Division of Pediatric Pulmonary and Cystic Fibrosis, The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children’s Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA

5. Cystic Fibrosis Center and Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Cohen Children’s Medical Center of Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA

6. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, USA

Abstract

Background: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF). Objectives: We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF. Design: Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent via a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. Methods: We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix. Results: Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I’m feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens. Conclusion: With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3