Medicalization, Ambivalence and Social Control: Mothers’ Descriptions of Educators and ADD/ADHD

Author:

Malacrida Claudia1

Affiliation:

1. University of Lethbridge, Canada,

Abstract

Conrad notes that non-medical personnel often accomplish the routine, everyday work of medicalization. This is particularly so in the case of Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder, where teachers, special educators and school psychologists identify, assess and administer medication to ‘problematic’ children. Drawing on data from interviews with Canadian and British mothers of ADD/ADHD children, this article explores mothers’ perceptions of educators’ roles in medicalizing children who are different, comparing medicalization in two divergent sites. In Canada, where ADD/ADHD is a highly medicalized phenomenon, and teachers have few alternative forms of social control available to them in classrooms, it appears that educators are prepared to identify problem children and press for medical treatment with remarkable vigor. In Britain, where medicalization remains incomplete, and where teachers and special educators have more stringent alternative forms of social control available to them, educators were often described as gatekeepers who will refuse the label or to administer medication.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health (social science)

Reference11 articles.

1. Chisholm, P. (1996). The ADD dilemma: Is Ritalin the best way to treat Attention Deficit Disorder? MacLean’s Magazine, 46-47 .

2. Medicalization and Social Control

3. Cosgrove, P.V.F. (1997). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A UK review . Primary Care Psychiatry, 3, 101-113 .

4. Kewley, G. (1998). Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder is underdiagnosed and undertreated in Britain . British Medical Journal, 23(316), 1594-1596 .

5. Kiger, G. (1985). Economic transformation and the processing of hyperactive school children . Mid-American Review of Sociology, 10, 65-85 .

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3