Affiliation:
1. Bar Ilan University, Israel,
Abstract
This paper discusses the feelings and experiences of Israeli-Arab social workers following terror attacks during the Second Intifada, against the background of two contrasting perspectives: Terror Management Theory and the Contact Hypothesis. The findings, based on in-depth interviews with 25 professionals, show pervasive tension and anxiety following attacks. Consistent with the Contact Hypothesis, however, findings also show that the interviewees’ degree of closeness with Jewish colleagues affected both their own feelings and behaviors and those of the Jews they spoke about. Relationships lacking warmth or friendship created distancing after an attack. On the other hand, interviewees with warm and friendly relations with Jewish co-workers reported heightened alertness associated with discomfort following an attack. Findings also show that close relations with their Jewish colleagues could alleviate considerable anxiety and exclusion they felt after terror attacks.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication,Social Psychology
Reference68 articles.
1. Trauma and mental health of children in Gaza.
2. The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations
3. Araf-Bader, C. ( 2006). Burning out, changing and mute discussions in the Arab-Palestinian society in Israel. In H. Herzog & K. Lahad (Eds.) Knowledge and silence: on mechanisms of denial and repression in Israeli society (pp. 105-112). Jerusalem: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakkibutz Hameuchad Publishing House.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献