Drawing on Accounts of Long-Term Urinary Catheter Use

Author:

Chapple Alison1,Prinjha Suman1,Feneley Roger2,Ziebland Sue1

Affiliation:

1. University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

2. Emeritus Consultant Urologist to the North Bristol NHS Trust

Abstract

The design of the Foley catheter has not changed since 1937. Scientists interested in medical technology tend to focus on state-of-the-art designs for newsworthy specialties rather than the more mundane technologies of daily life. We interviewed 36 people living with a long-term urinary catheter in the United Kingdom, who described limitations of the current catheter design, including infections and complications and consequences for social life and relationships, and their perceptions of whose responsibility it was to improve the design. All took steps to hide the urine bag, but the need to use a catheter and urine bag had, for some, a very detrimental effect on social life and relationships. People living with long-term catheters are relatively isolated at home and dealing with many different underlying health problems, undermining opportunities to speak with a collective patient voice. Qualitative health researchers could act as a conduit to help stimulate new designs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Indwelling catheter patient experiences and the potential usability and acceptance of the T‐Control® prototype urinary catheter;International Journal of Urological Nursing;2023-03-16

2. Staff and patient perceptions of a community urinary catheter service;International Journal of Urological Nursing;2020-03-30

3. What do patients say about their experience with urinary catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters?;American Journal of Infection Control;2019-09

4. Managing long term indwelling urinary catheters;BMJ;2018-10-11

5. Innovating urinary catheter design: An introduction to the engineering challenge;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine;2018-05-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3