Affiliation:
1. Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans
Abstract
Anumber of articles in the nursing literature discuss the differences between descriptive and interpretive approaches to doing phenomenology. A review of studies demonstrates, however, that many researchers do not articulate which approach guides the study, nor do they identify the philosophical assumptions on which the study is based. Such lack of clarity makes it difficult for the reader to obtain a sense of how the knowledge produced by the study is to be evaluated and used. In this article, the authors compare the philosophical components of descriptive and interpretive approaches to doing phenomenology and illustrate types of knowledge produced by each through reviewing specific studies. They focus on the various uses of phenomenology in generating useful knowledge for health care practice. Keywords:qualitative; hermeneutic; critical theory; Husserl; Heidegger; existentialism; phenomenology
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference13 articles.
1. Allen, D. G. (1995). Hermeneutics: Philosophical traditions and nursing practice research. NursingScience Quarterly, 8(4), 174-182.
2. Hermeneutic phenomenology: philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research
3. Beck, C. T. (1992). The lived experience of post-partum depression: Aphenomenological study. NursingResearch, 41(3), 166-170.
4. Campbell, J. C. & Bunting, S. (1991). Voices and paradigms: Perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 13(3), 1-15.
5. Cohen, M. Z. (1987). Ahistorical overview of the phenomenological movement. Image: Journal of NursingScholarship, 19(1), 31-34.
Cited by
692 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献