The Effect of the Pressure–Volume Curve for Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Author:

Hata J. Steven1234,Togashi Kei5,Kumar Avinash B.6,Hodges Linda D.7,Kaiser Eric F.8,Tessmann Paul B.9,Faust Christopher A.10,Sessler Daniel I.11

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Outcomes Research, Cardiac Anesthesiology, and General Anesthesiology, Center for Critical Care, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

2. Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Center for Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

3. Department of General Anesthesiology, Center for Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

5. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

6. Division of Critical Care in the Department of Anesthesia, University of Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, USA

7. Imperial Drive, O'Fallon, MO, USA

8. Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

9. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Florida; Gainesville, FL, USA

10. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

11. Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Abstract

Purpose Methods to optimize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain controversial despite decades of research. The pressure–volume curve (PVC), a graphical ventilator relationship, has been proposed for prescription of PEEP in ARDS. Whether the use of PVC’s improves survival remains unclear. Methods In this systematic review, we assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PVC-guided treatment with conventional PEEP management on survival in ARDS based on the search of the National Library of Medicine from January 1, 1960, to January 1, 2010, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Three RCTs were identified with a total of 185 patients, 97 with PVC-guided treatment and 88 with conventional PEEP management. Results The PVC-guided PEEP was associated with an increased probability of 28-day or hospital survival (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 4.9) using a random-effects model without significant heterogeneity ( I2 test: P = .75). The PVC-guided ventilator support was associated with reduced cumulative risk of mortality (−0.24 (95% CI −0.38, −0.11). The PVC-managed patients received greater PEEP (standardized mean difference [SMD] 5.7 cm H2O, 95% CI 2.4, 9.0) and lower plateau pressures (SMD −1.2 cm H2O, 95% CI −2.2, −0.2), albeit with greater hypercapnia with increased arterial pCO2 (SMD 8 mm Hg, 95% CI 2, 14). Weight-adjusted tidal volumes were significantly lower in PVC-guided than conventional ventilator management (SMD 2.6 mL/kg, 95% CI −3.3, −2.0). Conclusion This analysis supports an association that ventilator management guided by the PVC for PEEP management may augment survival in ARDS. Nonetheless, only 3 randomized trials have addressed the question, and the total number of patients remains low. Further outcomes studies appear required for the validation of this methodology.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3