The Deferred Consent Model in a Prospective Observational Study Evaluating Myocardial Injury in the Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Honarmand Kimia1,Belley-Cote Emilie P.23,Ulic Diana4,Khalifa Abubaker1,Gibson Andrew1,McClure Graham5,Savija Nevena3,Alshamsi Fayez6,D’Aragon Frederick78,Rochwerg Bram12,Duan Erick H.2,Karachi Tim1,Lamontagne François89,Devereaux P. J.125,Whitlock Richard P.510,Cook Deborah J.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

3. Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

4. Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

7. Department of Anesthesia, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

8. Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

9. Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

10. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is a hallmark of ethical clinical research. An inherent challenge in critical care research is obtaining consent when patients lack decision-making capacity. One solution is deferred consent, which is often used for studies that are low risk or involve emergency interventions. Our objective was to describe a deferred consent model in a low-risk critical care study. Methods: Prognostic Value of Elevated Troponins in Critical Illness Study was a prospective, pilot observational study of critically ill patients in 3 intensive care units, involving serial electrocardiograms and cardiac biomarkers. Newly admitted patients were enrolled over 1 month. When possible, informed consent was obtained a priori from the patient or substitute decision maker (SDM); otherwise, consent was deferred until the patient regained consent capacity or until their SDM was available. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between patient’s sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, study center, person providing consent (patient vs SDM), method of consent (telephone vs in person), and the provision or not of informed consent. Results: The overall consent rate was 80.1% (213 of 266 persons approached). Of the 53 persons declining consent, 37 (69.8%) agreed to the use of data collected up until that point. Over half of all consent encounters were with patients rather than SDMs. Median interval delay between enrollment and the consent encounter was 1 day. On multivariate analysis, the only variable associated with consent was male sex of the patient (odds ratio for males 2.59, confidence interval: 1.19-5.63). Conclusion: Deferred consent facilitates implementation of time-sensitive research protocols until a consent encounter is possible. As a feasible alternative to exclusive a priori consent, the deferred consent model can be useful in low-risk studies in critically ill patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3