Abstract
In any negligence or malpractice action the aggrieved party must establish by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) that the defendant has failed to conform to a certain standard of conduct, (2) that there is a reasonable cause-and-effect relationship between that conduct and the alleged injury, and (3) that the loss or injury is of a type of concern to the law. When applied to psychiatry and related fields, the author finds that, in a malpractice action, with the exclusion of similar facts evidence, establishing fault or causation is usually a happenstance.
Subject
Law,Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献