Definitions of occupational balance and their coverage by instruments

Author:

Dür Mona1,Unger Julia2,Stoffer Michaela3,Drăgoi Răzvan4,Kautzky-Willer Alexandra5,Fialka-Moser Veronika6,Smolen Josef7,Stamm Tanja8

Affiliation:

1. Lecturer and Researcher, Department of Health Sciences, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Austria; Lecturer, Researcher and PhD Candidate, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

2. Lecturer and Researcher, FH Joanneum, Bad Gleichenberg, Austria

3. Research Fellow and PhD Candidate, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

4. Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania

5. Head of Gender Medicine Unit, Deputy Head of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

6. Head of Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

7. Head of Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

8. University of Applied Health Sciences, Austria

Abstract

Introduction Occupational balance is an important and widely used concept in occupational therapy and occupational science. There is, however, not one unified definition in use, but several different ones, and thus instruments that measure the concept in research studies are diverse as well. Consequently, it is unclear how instruments and definitions correspond. The purpose of this study was to examine the coverage of occupational balance definitions by occupational balance instruments. Method Within a mixed-methods design we conducted a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of definitions and items of existing instruments. Definitions and items were extracted from articles identified in a systematic literature search. The extent of congruence and coverage between definitions and instruments was examined. Results The definitions used in 47 articles were structured into 19 categories. The categories which were found in most definitions were a balance of ‘various occupational patterns and areas’ (42; 89%) and ‘occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilities’ (35; 75%); 20 instruments were explored. Together they covered 16 (84%) of the 19 categories. Conclusion Knowing which instruments cover which dimensions of occupational balance can support occupational therapists, other health professionals and health researchers in their selection of an instrument to measure occupational balance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3