Affiliation:
1. University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Abstract
Although well-established criteria exist for evaluating the quality of research conducted using the Positivistic lens, and some criteria exist for judging research conducted using the Postmodernist lens, few criteria exist for judging research conducted using the Pragmatic lens. This is significant as mixed methods, complexity, and systems dynamics research belong to this lens, and a lack of criteria for judging quality may alternately contribute to either a shortage of Pragmatic research or a plethora of lower quality, uncritically evaluated Pragmatic research. The purpose of this article is to propose a theory-building process for Pragmatic research and to explore some possible criteria for evaluating the quality of Pragmatic research.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Quelles compétences pour insuffler un environnement inclusif ?;Management & Sciences Sociales;2023-01-01
2. Autopraxeography: a method to step back from vulnerability;Journal of Work-Applied Management;2022-10-21
3. The Interplay between Theory and Practice in HRD;Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students;2021
4. Pragmatism and Human Resource Development;Human Resource Development Review;2017-03
5. The Interplay between Theory and Practice in HRD;Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development