Abstract
PurposeStudies on vulnerability in the workplace, although relevant, are rare because it is difficult to access. This article aims to focus on the benefits of using autopraxeography to study and step back from vulnerability at work.Design/methodology/approachAutopraxeography uses researchers' experience to build knowledge.FindingsAutopraxeography provides a better understanding of vulnerability and the opportunity to step back from the difficulties experienced. Instead of ignoring experiences related to vulnerability, this method makes it possible to transform them into new avenues of knowledge. Moreover, it enables researchers to step back from experiences of vulnerability, thus making them feel more secure.Originality/valueThe main differences from other self-studies stem from the epistemological paradigm in which this method is anchored: pragmatic constructivism. The most important difference is the production of generic knowledge in three recursive steps: writing in a naïve way, developing the epistemic work and building generic knowledge.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference67 articles.
1. Managerial learning challenges in a complex world;Journal of Work-Applied Management,2018
2. Autoethnography;The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods,2017
3. To explore new avenues: experiential testimonio research;Management Decision,2014
4. From disillusion to the development of professional judgment: experience of an implementation process of a human complexity course;SageOpen,2016
5. Vulnerable workers' employability competences: the role of establishing clear expectations, developmental inducements, and social organizational goals;Journal of Business Ethics,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献