Affiliation:
1. George Mason University, USA
2. Florida Atlantic University, USA
Abstract
Amidst numerous curricular reforms across the USA that censor reading materials and promote standardized literacy policies, the authors ask in this article: What rights do early childhood teachers and students have in curriculum-making, and to the very materiality of their own classrooms? More broadly, they wonder: How do material regulations in US schools impact the curricular work of restorative justice in early literacy classrooms? The authors examine one curriculum material used in classrooms across the USA, using theories of materiality to explain its orientation, disorientation, and reorientation within discourses around anti-critical race theory and pro-“science of reading” legislation. Moreover, they aim to explore the potentialities of curricula as agents of restorative justice and, consequently, the threats to justice from the disorientations expressed around specific curriculum materials.
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference61 articles.
1. Queer Phenomenology
2. A phenomenology of whiteness
3. Mixed orientations
4. Aldrich M (2022) How the age appropriate debate is altering curriculum in Tennessee and nationwide. Chalkbeat, 5 May. Available at: https://projects.chalkbeat.org/2022/age-appropriate-books-critical-race-theory-tennessee-curriculum/ (accessed 20 August 2022).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献