Affiliation:
1. Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Germany
2. Scientific Institute of Romagna for the Investigation and Treatment of Tumors (IRST), Meldola (FC), Italy
3. Loccioni Humancare, Moie di Maiolati (AN), Italy
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare environmental contamination of cyclophosphamide (CP) during 1 week of drug compounding by conventional manual procedure in a biological safety cabinet (BSC) with laminar airflow and a new robotic drug preparation system (APOTECAchemo). Methods During four consecutive days, similar numbers of infusion bags with cyclophosphamide were prepared with both techniques in a cross-over design. Wipe samples (49 for BSC, 50 for APOTECAchemo) were taken at several locations (gloves, infusion bags, trays, BSC-benches, floor) in the pharmacy and analyzed for CP concentrations by GC-MSMS (LOD 0.2 ng/sample). Results The detection rate was 70% in the BSC versus 15% in APOTECAchemo. During manual preparation of admixtures using BSC contamination with CP was below 0.001 ng/cm2 at most locations, but significant on gloves (0.0004–0.0967 ng/cm2) and the majority (70%) of infusion bags (<0.0004–2.89 ng/cm2). During robotic preparation by APOTECAchemo, gloves (1 of 8: 0.0007 ng/cm2) and infusion bags (3 of 20: 0.0005, 0.0019, 0.0094 ng/cm2) were considerably less contaminated. Residual contamination was found on the surfaces under the dosing device in the compounding area (0.0293–0.1603 ng/cm2) inside the robotic system. Conclusions Compared to outcomes of other studies, our results underline good manufacturing procedures in this pharmacy with low contamination for both techniques (BSC and APOTECAchemo). Comparison of both preparation procedures validated that contamination of infusion bags was much lower by using the robotic system.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Oncology
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献