Affiliation:
1. Boston College, USA
2. Northeastern University, USA
Abstract
How do gig workers respond to the various financial, physical, and legal risks their work entails? Answers to this question have remained unclear, largely because previous studies have overlooked structurally induced variations in the experience of platform work. In this article, we develop a theory of differential embeddedness to explain why workers’ orientations toward the risks of gig work vary. We argue further that because platforms define themselves merely as mediators of exchanges between workers and customers, they systematically expose workers to various forms of customer malfeasance, ranging from fraud and tip baiting to harassment and assault. We develop this perspective using interviews with 70 workers in the ride-hail, grocery shopping, and food delivery sectors. The structure of labor platforms indirectly invites workers to exhibit distinct normative orientations toward the risks that gig work entails while also multiplying the sources of these risks.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Accounting
Reference58 articles.
1. Why platform capitalism is not the future of work
2. Bargain-Darrigues G, Schor JB (2023) What difference does a platform make? A comparison of institutional and informal job-matching sites Unpublished paper. Department of Sociology, Boston College, USA.
3. A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms
4. Cameron LD (2023) Remanufacturing consent: how algorithmic management repurposes workplace consent [Unpublished paper]. The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献