Why platform capitalism is not the future of work

Author:

Azzellini Dario1,Greer Ian2,Umney Charles3

Affiliation:

1. University of Zacatecas, Mexico

2. Cornell University, USA

3. University of Leeds, UK

Abstract

This article examines the assumptions behind the sociology of work and industrial relations literature on online labour-based platforms. This literature has critically examined working conditions and worker resistance in platform work, but it has done so without criticising what we call the ‘metanarrative of the platform economy’. This metanarrative enables a weaving together of platform work with broader trends such as precarisation, neoliberalisation, financialisation and marketisation, but it makes it difficult for scholars to explain the small size of the platform workforce or to understand the diverse forms that platforms take. We argue that in order to understand the limits and diversity of platforms it is important to understand the inherent problems of platforms as capitalist business models. We suggest a research agenda that decentres some of the better-known platform models (ridesharing and food delivery) and carries out in-depth studies of work and exchange in other sectors.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Reference61 articles.

1. European legal framework for ‘digital labour platforms’, European Commission report;Aloisi, A.,2018

2. Why isn’t there an Uber for live music? The digitalisation of intermediaries and the limits of the platform economy;Azzellini, D.,2022

3. A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms (No. 70);Bessa, I.,2022

4. The resistible rise of the temporary employment industry in France;Brook, P.,2020

5. Exploring business models for MOOCs in higher education;Burd, E.L.,2015

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Democratizing Platform Work from Below;STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI;2024-02

2. Platform work and the increasıng precarity of labor;Memleket Siyaset Yönetim;2023-12-28

3. Platform labour in contexts of high informality: Any improvement for workers? A critical assessment based on the case of Argentina;New Technology, Work and Employment;2023-11-30

4. Book Review;Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research;2023-11

5. Consent and Contestation: How Platform Workers Reckon with the Risks of Gig Labor;Work, Employment and Society;2023-09-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3