Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples

Author:

Campbell Steve1ORCID,Greenwood Melanie2ORCID,Prior Sarah3ORCID,Shearer Toniele4,Walkem Kerrie4,Young Sarah5,Bywaters Danielle4ORCID,Walker Kim6

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Clinical Redesign, Nursing, Associate Head Research, School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia

2. Associate Professor, Director Post Graduate Courses, School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia

3. Lecturer, Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia

4. Lecturer, PhD Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia

5. Professor of Health Care Improvement, School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, School of Health Science, Australia

6. PhD Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia

Abstract

Background Purposive sampling has a long developmental history and there are as many views that it is simple and straightforward as there are about its complexity. The reason for purposive sampling is the better matching of the sample to the aims and objectives of the research, thus improving the rigour of the study and trustworthiness of the data and results. Four aspects to this concept have previously been described: credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability. Aims The aim of this paper is to outline the nature and intent of purposive sampling, presenting three different case studies as examples of its application in different contexts. Results Presenting individual case studies has highlighted how purposive sampling can be integrated into varying contexts dependent on study design. The sampling strategies clearly situate each study in terms of trustworthiness for data collection and analysis. The selected approach to purposive sampling used in each case aligns to the research methodology, aims and objectives, thus addressing each of the aspects of rigour. Conclusions Making explicit the approach used for participant sampling provides improved methodological rigour as judged by the four aspects of trustworthiness. The cases presented provide a guide for novice researchers of how rigour may be addressed in qualitative research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3