Differences of hospitals’ organisational climates and nurses’ intent to stay: Nurses’ perspectives

Author:

Mrayyan Majd T1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing, Adult Health Nursing Department, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

Abstract

Abstract This research studied the differences of hospitals’ organisational climates and nurses’ intent to stay at different types of Jordanian hospitals and investigated the relationship between the two concepts, from the point views of nurses. In 2005, using convenience sampling technique, a survey was used to collect the data. A total of 361 nurses were recruited; 190 nurses from governmental hospitals, 107 nurses from teaching hospitals and 64 nurses from private hospitals. Comparisons were performed using the total scores and the individual items of scales. Farley’s Nursing Practice Environment Scale (NPES) was used to assess the organisational climates (Farly, MJ, Nyberg, J (1990) Nurs Health Care11: 532–535). McCain’s Behavioral Commitment Scale (1990) was used to measure nurses’ intent to stay (McCloskey, JC (1990) Image J Nurs Sch22: 140–143). Nurses ‘somewhat disagree’ about the organisational climates of their hospitals. Quality of care and professionalism were the most important variables that influence hospitals’ organisational climates. There were some significant differences between nurses at different types of hospitals in their perceptions about hospitals’ organisational climates. Nurses were neutral in reporting their intent to stay; but there were no statistically significant differences. Although, nurses plan to stay at their jobs for at least 2–3 years and as long as possible, some nurse reported that they will not stay at their jobs to the end of their careers. Nurse administrators have to create supportive organisational climates that would encourage nurses to stay at their jobs to the end of their careers. This would influence positively the quality of patient care and nurses’ professionalism. These outcomes could be achieved if nurse administrators use supportive leadership styles in organisations that are adaptive to change and professionals’ needs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3