Evaluating integrated care for people with complex needs

Author:

Kasteridis Panagiotis1ORCID,Mason Anne2ORCID,Street Andrew3

Affiliation:

1. Research Fellow, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK

2. Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK

3. Professor, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK

Abstract

Objectives As part of the Vanguard programme, two integrated care models were introduced in South Somerset for people with complex care needs: the Complex Care Team and Enhanced Primary Care. We assessed their impact on a range of utilization measures and mortality. Methods We used monthly individual-level linked primary and secondary care data from April 2014 to March 2018 to assess outcomes before and after the introduction of the care models. The analysis sample included 564 Complex Care Team and 841 Enhanced Primary Care cases that met specific criteria. We employed propensity score methods to identify out-of-area control patients and difference-in-differences analysis to isolate the care models’ impact. Results We found no evidence of significantly reduced utilization in any of the Complex Care Team or Enhanced Primary Care cohorts. The death rate was significantly lower only for those in the first Enhanced Primary Care cohort. Conclusions The integrated care models did not significantly reduce utilization nor consistently reduce mortality. Future research should test longer-term outcomes associated with the new models of care and quantify their contribution in the context of broader initiatives.

Funder

NHS England

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference14 articles.

1. Society at a Glance 2011

2. Who would most benefit from improved integrated care? Implementing an analytical strategy in South Somerset

3. NHS England. Integrated primary and acute care systems (PACS) – describing the care model and the business model. Gateway publication reference: 05806. London: NHS England, 2016, p.32.

4. NHS England. New Care Models: Vanguards – developing a blueprint for the future of NHS and care services. London: NHS England, 2016, p.64.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3