Inter-organisational collaboration enabling care delivery in a specialist cancer surgery provider network: A qualitative study

Author:

Vindrola-Padros Cecilia1ORCID,Ramsay Angus IG2,Black Georgia3ORCID,Barod Ravi4,Hines John5,Mughal Muntzer6,Shackley David7,Fulop Naomi J8

Affiliation:

1. Senior Research Fellow, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK

2. Senior Research Fellow, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK

3. Principal Research Fellow, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK

4. Consultant Urological Surgeon, Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

5. Consultant Urological Surgeon and London Cancer Urology Pathway Board Director, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

6. Consultant General & Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeon, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

7. Medical Director, Greater Manchester Cancer and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

8. Professor of Health Care Organisation and Management, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Objective To explore the processes, challenges and strategies used to govern and maintain inter-organisational collaboration between professionals in a provider network in London, United Kingdom, which implemented major system change focused on the centralisation of specialist cancer surgery. Methods We used a qualitative design involving interviews with stakeholders ( n = 117), non-participant observations ( n = 163) and documentary analysis ( n = 100). We drew on an existing model of collaboration in healthcare organisations and expanded this framework by applying it to the analysis of collaboration in the context of major system change. Results Network provider organisations established shared goals, maintained central figures who could create and sustain collaboration, and promoted distributed forms of leadership. Still, organisations continued to encounter barriers or challenges in relation to developing opportunities for mutual acquaintanceship across all professional groups; the active sharing of knowledge, expertise and good practice across the network; the fostering of trust; and creation of information exchange infrastructures fit for collaborative purposes. Conclusion Collaborative relationships changed over time, becoming stronger post-implementation in some areas, but continued to be negotiated where resistance to the centralisation remained. Future research should explore the sustainability of these relationships and further unpack how hierarchies and power relationships shape inter-organisational collaboration.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3