Unravelling collaborative governance dynamics within healthcare networks: a scoping review

Author:

Belrhiti Zakaria123ORCID,Bigdeli Maryam4,Lakhal Aniss25,Kaoutar Dib25,Zbiri Saad123,Belabbes Sanaa123

Affiliation:

1. International School Mohammed VI of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS) , UM6SS – Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco

2. Knowledge for Health Policies, UM6SS , Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco

3. Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation (CM6RI) , Rue Mohamed Al Jazouli – Madinat Al Irfane Rabat 10 100, Rabat Rue, Mohamed Al Jazouli – 10 100, Morocco

4. World Health Organization , 3 Av. S.A.R. Sidi Mohamed, Rabat, Geneva 10170, Morocco

5. Directorate of Hospitals and Ambulatory Care, Ministry of Health and Social Protection , Route d’El Jadida, Agdal, Rabat 10100, Morocco

Abstract

Abstract In many countries, healthcare systems suffer from fragmentation between hospitals and primary care. In response, many governments institutionalized healthcare networks (HN) to facilitate integration and efficient healthcare delivery. Despite potential benefits, the implementation of HN is often challenged by inefficient collaborative dynamics that result in delayed decision-making, lack of strategic alignment and lack of reciprocal trust between network members. Yet, limited attention has been paid to the collective dynamics, challenges and enablers for effective inter-organizational collaborations. To consider these issues, we carried out a scoping review to identify the underlying processes for effective inter-organizational collaboration and the contextual conditions within which these processes are triggered. Following appropriate methodological guidance for scoping reviews, we searched four databases [PubMed (n = 114), Web of Science (n = 171), Google Scholar (n = 153) and Scopus (n = 52)] and used snowballing (n = 22). A total of 37 papers addressing HN including hospitals were included. We used a framework synthesis informed by the collaborative governance framework to guide data extraction and analysis, while being sensitive to emergent themes. Our review showed the prominence of balancing between top-down and bottom-up decision-making (e.g. strategic vs steering committees), formal procedural arrangements and strategic governing bodies in stimulating participative decision-making, collaboration and sense of ownership. In a highly institutionalized context, the inter-organizational partnership is facilitated by pre-existing legal frameworks. HN are suitable for tackling wicked healthcare issues by mutualizing resources, staff pooling and improved coordination. Overall performance depends on the capacity of partners for joint action, principled engagement and a closeness culture, trust relationships, shared commitment, distributed leadership, power sharing and interoperability of information systems To promote the effectiveness of HN, more bottom-up participative decision-making, formalization of governance arrangement and building trust relationships are needed. Yet, there is still inconsistent evidence on the effectiveness of HN in improving health outcomes and quality of care.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference137 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3